Phys. Rev. A 64, 037401 (2001) [3 pages]Comment on “Photodetachment in combined static and dynamic electric fields”
I. I. Fabrikant1, M. V. Frolov2, N. L. Manakov2, and A. F. Starace1 Received 13 November 2000; published 8 August 2001 The theoretical analysis of C. Rangan and A. R. P. Rau [Phys. Rev. A 61, 033405 (2000)] on the process of photodetachment of H- in a strong static electric field, which calls into question the predictions of B. Gao and A. F. Starace [Phys. Rev. A 42, 5580 (1990)] and also of M. Q. Bao et al. [Phys. Rev. A 58, 411 (1998)], is shown in this Comment to be incorrect. First, we point out that a number of assumptions of Rangan and Rau’s analysis rest on tenuous theoretical grounds. Second, we adduce two completely independent and different analyses of the problem which precisely confirm the results of Gao and Starace. These independent analyses also provide the interpretation that Gao and Starace’s predicted strong-field effects are due to the exact account of the influence of the static electric field, not only on the final state of the detached electron, but also on the initial bound-electron state. ©2001 The American Physical Society
URL: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.037401 See AlsoOriginal: Chitra Rangan and A. R. Rau, Photodetachment in combined static and dynamic electric fields, Phys. Rev. A 61, 033405 (2000) Reply: A. R. Rau and Chitra Rangan, Reply to “Comment on ‘Photodetachment in combined static and dynamic electric fields’ ”, Phys. Rev. A 64, 037402 (2001) [ Abstract | Previous article | Next article | Issue 3 ] |
A new free weekly publication from APS
Read the latest from Physics:
Viewpoint: Can superconducting rings provide clues to the early development of the universe? |


