Phys. Rev. A 64, 037401 (2001) [3 pages]

Comment on “Photodetachment in combined static and dynamic electric fields”

Download: PDF (37 kB) or Buy this Article (Use Article Pack) Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

I. I. Fabrikant1, M. V. Frolov2, N. L. Manakov2, and A. F. Starace1
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0111
2Department of Physics, Voronezh State University, Voronezh, 394693, Russia

Received 13 November 2000; published 8 August 2001

The theoretical analysis of C. Rangan and A. R. P. Rau [Phys. Rev. A 61, 033405 (2000)] on the process of photodetachment of H- in a strong static electric field, which calls into question the predictions of B. Gao and A. F. Starace [Phys. Rev. A 42, 5580 (1990)] and also of M. Q. Bao et al. [Phys. Rev. A 58, 411 (1998)], is shown in this Comment to be incorrect. First, we point out that a number of assumptions of Rangan and Rau’s analysis rest on tenuous theoretical grounds. Second, we adduce two completely independent and different analyses of the problem which precisely confirm the results of Gao and Starace. These independent analyses also provide the interpretation that Gao and Starace’s predicted strong-field effects are due to the exact account of the influence of the static electric field, not only on the final state of the detached electron, but also on the initial bound-electron state.


©2001 The American Physical Society

URL: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.037401
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.037401
PACS: 32.60.+i, 32.80.Gc

See Also

Original: Chitra Rangan and A. R. Rau, Photodetachment in combined static and dynamic electric fields, Phys. Rev. A 61, 033405 (2000)

Reply: A. R. Rau and Chitra Rangan, Reply to “Comment on ‘Photodetachment in combined static and dynamic electric fields’ ”, Phys. Rev. A 64, 037402 (2001)

[ Abstract  |  Previous article  |  Next article  |  Issue 3 ]